<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The integrated environmentalist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Because it's possible to make a difference and have a wash in the same week</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Three Gorges, or &#8220;My blog is about to become inaccessible in China&#8221; by Maximus</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/the-three-gorges-or-my-blog-is-about-to-become-inaccessible-in-china/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/the-three-gorges-or-my-blog-is-about-to-become-inaccessible-in-china/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a continuation of the topic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a continuation of the topic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sharks: Not as bad as you think by landy</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/sharksnot-as-bad-as-you-think/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>landy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/sharksnot-as-bad-as-you-think/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>ya! sharks really are not as bad as they are represented as...but still we kill them!!!
they just killed a 844 pound shark....its crazy
check out this article about it

http://newstrain.com/2007/10/17/whos-scared-of-the-big-ole-maco-shark/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya! sharks really are not as bad as they are represented as&#8230;but still we kill them!!!<br />
they just killed a 844 pound shark&#8230;.its crazy<br />
check out this article about it</p>
<p><a href="http://newstrain.com/2007/10/17/whos-scared-of-the-big-ole-maco-shark/" rel="nofollow">http://newstrain.com/2007/10/17/whos-scared-of-the-big-ole-maco-shark/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exciting things afoot&#8230; by cerimorgan</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/exciting-things-afoot/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>cerimorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/exciting-things-afoot/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Indeed! Woo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed! Woo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exciting things afoot&#8230; by garlicsmack</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/exciting-things-afoot/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>garlicsmack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/exciting-things-afoot/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Aaaah, you graduated? Woo! Congrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaah, you graduated? Woo! Congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conversations with people who don&#8217;t fully understand things by Chris</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I'll re-post it:

Mickel:

The graphs were of both temperature and CO2 concentration over the last 400,000 years. They both vary naturally over time, but the fact that they're vary together shows that they're probably related. Normally this would be as good as proven by plotting a graph with temperature on one axis and CO2 concentration on the other and showing that this gives a straight line, which for some reason nobody's bothered to do.

I have very roughly, and from the graph you can guess the relationship between the temperature (which we'll imaginatively call "T") and atmospheric CO2 concentration ("C") and I make it T = 0.2C - 50.

But I'm not a very good physicist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll re-post it:</p>
<p>Mickel:</p>
<p>The graphs were of both temperature and CO2 concentration over the last 400,000 years. They both vary naturally over time, but the fact that they&#8217;re vary together shows that they&#8217;re probably related. Normally this would be as good as proven by plotting a graph with temperature on one axis and CO2 concentration on the other and showing that this gives a straight line, which for some reason nobody&#8217;s bothered to do.</p>
<p>I have very roughly, and from the graph you can guess the relationship between the temperature (which we&#8217;ll imaginatively call &#8220;T&#8221 <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> and atmospheric CO2 concentration (&#8221;C&#8221 <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> and I make it T = 0.2C - 50.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not a very good physicist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conversations with people who don&#8217;t fully understand things by Chris</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>What happened to my comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to my comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conversations with people who don&#8217;t fully understand things by Christopher White</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Andy - the graphs were rubbish, true. They showed that while atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and mean temperature have varied naturally over the last 400,000 years, the fact they vary together -- ie they're covariant -- probably means their is a causal relationship between the two. In fact, if they'd actually bothered taking out the time axis and plotting CO2 concentration against temperature, they'd get a straight line (I did this yesterday just to check -- took me fucking ages) which in science "proves" that there's a relationship, very roughly Temperature = (0.2xCarbon Dioxide concentration)-50 I make it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy - the graphs were rubbish, true. They showed that while atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and mean temperature have varied naturally over the last 400,000 years, the fact they vary together &#8212; ie they&#8217;re covariant &#8212; probably means their is a causal relationship between the two. In fact, if they&#8217;d actually bothered taking out the time axis and plotting CO2 concentration against temperature, they&#8217;d get a straight line (I did this yesterday just to check &#8212; took me fucking ages) which in science &#8220;proves&#8221; that there&#8217;s a relationship, very roughly Temperature = (0.2xCarbon Dioxide concentration)-50 I make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conversations with people who don&#8217;t fully understand things by cerimorgan</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>cerimorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>You could have spent that hour learning to juggle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could have spent that hour learning to juggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conversations with people who don&#8217;t fully understand things by garlicsmack</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>garlicsmack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 00:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/24/conversations-with-people-who-dont-fully-understand-things/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I watched An Inconvenient Truth the other day. Well, the first hour anyway. Al Gore seemed to spend more time explaining why he was so well equipped to talk about global warming (much of which was, admittedly, a surprise) than he did with going into any detail about his graphs. Oh, his graphs. How that man loves his graphs. 

Shame he can't ever bloody label his axes, or explain to global warming ignoramuses like myself what the heck they're supposed to show. His audience for the recording must have understood much more, as at least three must have been hospitalized for hyperventilating during the filming.

But yes. No. That was really quite a silly way to spend an hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched An Inconvenient Truth the other day. Well, the first hour anyway. Al Gore seemed to spend more time explaining why he was so well equipped to talk about global warming (much of which was, admittedly, a surprise) than he did with going into any detail about his graphs. Oh, his graphs. How that man loves his graphs. </p>
<p>Shame he can&#8217;t ever bloody label his axes, or explain to global warming ignoramuses like myself what the heck they&#8217;re supposed to show. His audience for the recording must have understood much more, as at least three must have been hospitalized for hyperventilating during the filming.</p>
<p>But yes. No. That was really quite a silly way to spend an hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church of Environmentalism by Chris</title>
		<link>http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/05/the-church-of-environmentalism/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cerimorgan.wordpress.com/2007/03/05/the-church-of-environmentalism/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Gary: speaking of which, Chuffy and I are restarting our pro-animal testing protest idea. Just to piss off them silly cunts who spend all day outside Huntingdon Life Sciences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary: speaking of which, Chuffy and I are restarting our pro-animal testing protest idea. Just to piss off them silly cunts who spend all day outside Huntingdon Life Sciences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
