Conversations with people who don’t fully understand things
March 24, 2007I had the most perplexing conversation with a friend today.
We were discussing what would happen to society when oil and gas run out. I suggested the following scenario as a possibility:
Firstly, improvements in GIS etc mean we may find that the world has a lot more reserves than is now thought.
Secondly, when even these run out, we can go back to finishing off all the plentiful coal reserves which were considered economically unviable when huge oil fields were discovered.
Thirdly, this will not happen for some time, so by then the relatively new field of marketable renewable energy should have developed significantly, with dramatic improvements in technology.
Fourthly, we could all become France and go nuclear. To summarise, there are ways in which the world will not end when the oil runs out.
My friend (who i know is not joking about this) asked me if it was true that there are huge oil and gas reserves beneath Antarctica. Begrudgingly (because i knew where this was going) i confirmed it to be true. My friend then said “well if we aren’t gonna run out of oil for a while, we could just wait for global warming to completely melt Antarctica and then get the oil and gas from there, and also go snowboarding, because it would be really cool.”
At this point i tried to explain that Antarctica is so massive that it would take longer to melt than the time it would take for oil reserves to run out, but my friend had made his point and was running with it, and accused me of lying! “Why would i lie about how long it will take Antarctica to melt?” I asked him. His reply? “Because you are an environmentalist, and environmentalists lie.”
So in conclusion, thankyou very much to Al Gore for completely ruining my credibility.